Back to articles

What can we learn from the sports betting market ?

In this article, we'll look at how we can deal with uncertainty, take an objective look at the past, try to predict the future, and also analyse how we experience an unusual or exceptional event.

Understanding how we deal with uncertainty

One of the most interesting things to come out of the betting market is a better understanding of how people deal with the unknown. Many aspects of life are never certain: Will it rain today ? Will traffic jams make me late for work? Although we face these questions on a daily basis, we rarely take the time to think about why we make the decisions we do. In sports betting, that changes everything.

Whether it's deciding to take out an umbrella for the day, leaving for work ten minutes early to avoid the traffic jam or betting on Manchester United beating Chelsea. In all these examples, we are dealing with incomplete knowledge. However, for most people, just one of these three options requires more than a few seconds' thought.

Getting caught in the rain without an umbrella and being late for work are both risks, but they don't seem to carry the same weight as the money we might stake on a bet. A more tangible risk in the form of money allows the betting markets to give us a greater sense of 'skin in the game' and therefore allows us to better understand how we deal with life's uncertainties.

An insightful look at the past

An important part of betting, for those who take it seriously, is recording your bets and trying to learn from past events. However, this is usually done in order to improve the decision-making process for another bet. Whether it's comparing the odds you bet with with those in the market or reflecting on the expected positive value of your bet, the purpose of this hindsight is always to serve future actions.

Betting markets also offer the opportunity to look back at particular events and analyse the magnitude of an achievement or shock. Since odds are only a representation of probability, we can use betting markets to understand the likelihood or unlikelihood of an event.

Leicester City's Premier League win in 2015/16 is widely recognised as one of the greatest underdog stories in sporting history. It's pretty easy to recognise that Leicester had very little chance of being crowned champions at the end of their 38-game season. Most people would have had no trouble admitting that Leicester were in fact far more likely to be relegated (finish in the bottom three) than to win the title. But how far can we go in understanding this achievement?

The statistics tell us that Leicester were the first team to win the league outside Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City and Manchester United for 21 years. Claudio Ranieri's side were also the first to win the Premier League for the first time since 1978, while the club's wage bill and the aggregate transfer value of its squad were among the lowest in the league. It all sounds very impressive, but even with this information, it is still difficult to understand the scale of Leicester's success in the Premier League.

Betting odds explained: How do the odds work ?

This is where the betting market comes in. While the 5000/1 odds so often quoted by the media give us a figure to work with (a 0.02% chance of happening), this is tantamount to underestimating the achievement. So what was the real probability of Leicester winning the Premier League?

Joseph Buchdahl acknowledged that his use of Pinnacle's 1X2 odds for the 380 games in the season prior to Leicester's win and a Monte Carlo simulation of 100,000 runs had potential flaws in estimating Leicester's chances of winning the league. However, it gives us a much better idea than the generic 'once in a lifetime' and 'never again in a million years' comments that followed Leicester's success.

What does the betting market tell us about Leicester City's success in 2015/16? That it had around a 0.001% (1 in 100,000) chance of happening.

A clearer view of what the future holds ?

As well as adding a new layer of context to our assessment of past events, betting markets can also help us project into the future. While it is interesting to use betting markets to assess the likelihood of success or failure of sports teams, they have the power to tell us much more than that. Things that are more important than who will win a championship.

Political betting markets have been around for some time, but as political betting becomes more popular, bookmakers are investing more in managing these types of markets. As the money flows in, these markets become more efficient, allowing them to more reliably predict how voters will vote.

Opinion polls are an essential part of elections. Once seen as a good predictor of voter choice, they are increasingly divorced from actual results. Although they remain volatile, the growing popularity of political betting markets could give rise to a new method of trying to predict the most likely outcome of an election: the use of political betting markets.

As we know, bookmakers and the majority of punters were pretty far off the mark at the start of the 2016 US presidential election. Indeed, Pinnacle initially estimated that Donald Trump had around a 12% chance of becoming the Republican candidate in the election. It was when the race reached its final stages that the betting market emerged as an unlikely source to tell the world what was going on.

Those following the election markets live on Pinnacle already knew that Donald Trump was on his way to victory before the media announced his victory in Florida (one of the six crucial states previously held by the Democrats). How could the betting markets have known before the media? This is where information is most valuable.

If you know something before anyone else, or at least before the majority, betting markets give you a platform to make money from that information. The bookmaker has a constant stream of people with this type of information and can therefore give us a more accurate idea of the likelihood of an event occurring, as well as when an event changes that likelihood.

What happens when we experience a single event ?

In general, betting markets help us to understand how people deal with uncertainty. Why do people bet on certain outcomes ? What biases influence our decision-making process ? Are people capable of learning from their mistakes ? These are all fascinating concepts that could be (or have been) dealt with in individual articles. However, betting markets also provide us with a means of substantiating our opinions on very unique events.

The famous Floyd Mayweather v Conor McGregor boxing match of 2017 will go down in history as one of the most intriguing sporting events the world has ever seen. It was the subject of hype, opinion and analysis, as well as a betting market teeming with money - indeed, it was one of the most bet events in the history of sports betting.

While the circus of press conferences and persistent promotion made the fight seem like the ultimate spectacle, the betting business was perhaps more interesting than the fight itself. Not only did the size of the bets highlight the interest in the fight, but the evolution of the odds also showed the extent to which opinions differed as to the competitiveness of a boxing rookie against arguably the greatest boxer to ever step into a ring.

McGregor, who has never boxed professionally in his life, opened as a 12.00 underdog for the fight (odds suggest this translates into an 8.3% chance of victory). However, during the week of the fight, McGregor was listed at 5.92, more than doubling his chances of victory to 16.9%. What caused this sudden change in belief in McGregor's boxing ability ? An injury to Mayweather ? A change in the rules of the fight ? The answer is much simpler: money.

To the surprise of former Pinnacle sales director Marco Blume, and despite the obvious skills gap between the two men, people were so determined to bet on McGregor that the money kept flowing in despite the drastic drop in odds. Of course, there were big bets on the other side, but no matter how McGregor's odds changed and (in retrospect) how wrong the line was, people were still happy to bet on the Irishman.

In this case, the betting market served as a clear indicator of public opinion. The number of large bets made by 'sharp' customers was dwarfed by the recreational bets made by punters who didn't understand Conor McGregor's chances of beating Floyd Mayweather (

the favourite-longshot bias

in action). It also showed us how difficult it can be for people to imagine what could happen in a completely unique event.

What can we learn from betting markets ?

Betting markets exist because people invest money to try and get more out of it. While it can be interesting to invest your time and money to try and make a profit, it can also be interesting to look at betting markets from a different angle. They help us to understand how people think and behave, as well as offering an insightful look into the past and a predictive view of the future.

Saturday, March 23, 2024

In my same category


When you don’t know your edge, how much should you stake ?

Wednesday, April 3, 2024

In this article, you will learn about the reinterpretation of the different betting plans with Kelly's formula, as well as explanations of the impact on the loss and/or gain of units, the asymmetry of returns, and the symmetry of probability.Four years ag...

See the article


How to beat Pinnacle with opening odds alerts ?

Tuesday, March 12, 2024

In this article, we're going to show you the incredible power of Opening Odds alerts, which will enable you to stay one step ahead of the bookmaker, make the right decisions and maximise your winnings over the long term.If you've already called in a craft...

See the article


Can xG be used to predict soccer matches ?

Saturday, February 24, 2024

In this article, we will attempt to understand what expected goals are, use xGs to predict football matches and, finally, analyse the model created by the duo Mark Dixon and Stuart Coles from the University of Lancaster in the North West of England.Sports...

See the article